The Death of Wrestling: Abandoning Tradition for the Bright Lights of Hollywood
World Wide Wrestling Federation, World Championship Wrestling, World Wrestling Federation, World Wrestling Entertainment, National Wrestling Alliance, Extreme Championship Wrestling. All are bound by the one word and the one tradition, wrestling.
And yet coming out of Connecticut is now the dictate that the WWE is no longer a wrestling company. It is an entertainment company with many branches, including international movie studios and three publications.
Wrestling is no longer acceptable.
The WWE is not alone in this new phenomenon. As has been reported by Lords of Pain, the most recent TNA Impact show had just nine minutes and 58 seconds of wrestling in its 120-minute programme. Or put another way, there were more advertisements than there was wrestling!
Now we must surely appreciate that wrestling has changed, and that the days of simple grappling requires a change, but nine minutes and 58 seconds?!
The reality of wrestling today is that Eric Bischoff and Vince McMahon now see themselves as Hollywood directors. In their pursuit of legitimacy, they have abandoned wrestling tradition in the attempt of reaching the red carpets of the movie world.
The current format of TNA, which relies on “reality-based” interviews, now dominates the show, and yet this has come at the expense of its wrestling product. TNA has some amazing athletes, and yet its attempt to be some kind of “new age” wrestling means that it lost its core selling point, which is of course, wrestling.
Is there enough wrestling on TV?
-
Yes – Nice Balance of Interviews and Wrestling
12.5%
-
Yes – I prefer Interviews
18.8%
-
No – There is a poor balance in favour of Interviews
37.5%
-
No – We just need a little more wrestling
31.3%
Is there enough wrestling on TV?
The WWE is worse, however, and not a month goes by without another straight-to-DVD movie being released. The quality of such releases is highly questionable and has been critically slammed. How many adverts will we have to sit through for The Chaperone?
If they really wanted to push the venture, then surely, invest to impress?
As a wrestling fan, I want to see some entertainment, but I also want to watch wrestling. It is an art form, and the likes of Bret Hart, Kurt Angle and AJ Styles are masters. If Bischoff and McMahon really want to be Hollywood directors, then why can’t they at least keep the balance between wrestling and creative “angles?”
Maybe I am a cynical fan, but surely we watch wrestling for the action we see in the ring. All feuds require some creative angle and bits, but the balance needs to be right.
With only two weeks to go to the biggest event in the WWE’s calendar, the question remains, are we to call it EntertainmentMania?
Similar Posts:
- WWE Bullet Point: Smarts Outsmarted by Sean Waltman
- WWE: Triple H’s Return Gives Raw the Figurehead It Desperately Needs
- CM Punk: Will Money in the Bank Really Be Punk’s Final Night in WWE?
- TNA Wrestling: Will TNA Finally Realize Its Potential at Bound for Glory?
- WWE on the Road Again: Is Pro Wrestling Too American?